Imagine biting into a perfectly tender, buttery corn on the cob without ever standing over a hot stove. That’s exactly what cooking corn in a crockpot can do—it transforms ordinary corn into a juicy, flavorful delight while freeing you from constant stirring or monitoring. Whether you’re preparing a quick family dinner, hosting a summer party, or feeding a crowd, this method guarantees consistently delicious results with minimal effort.

Start by cleaning and husking 6–8 fresh corn cobs, arranging them neatly in your crockpot for even cooking. In a small bowl, melt ½ cup of butter and mix in your favorite seasonings—garlic powder, paprika, salt, pepper, and even a pinch of chili powder if you like a subtle kick. Pour the seasoned butter over the corn, then add ½ cup of water or broth to keep it extra moist, allowing the flavors to soak deeply into every kernel.

Cover the crockpot and cook on high for 2–3 hours or low for 4–5 hours. For the best results, rotate the corn halfway through cooking so each cob is evenly coated with the buttery mixture. Be careful not to lift the lid too often, as this lets heat escape and can slow down the cooking process, preventing the corn from reaching maximum flavor and tenderness.

When the corn is done, carefully remove it with tongs and place it on a serving platter. For an extra touch, drizzle with additional melted butter or sprinkle with fresh herbs like parsley or cilantro. The result is golden, juicy corn that bursts with flavor in every bite—a simple yet impressive side dish that will have everyone asking for seconds.

A hardworking mother says her young son completely destroyed every room in their home after she took his phone away as punishment. The damage is estimated at more than $70,000, leaving her devastated as she filmed the aftermath. From smashed windows to wrecked furniture, the entire home looked unlivable. Neighbors are shocked, and the video has sparked a heated debate online about parenting, discipline, and responsibility.

Six women who say they were trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein or his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell made a public appeal on Tuesday in Washington, D.C., demanding the federal government release more investigative files. They also urged former President Donald Trump to publicly rule out a pardon for Maxwell. The women appeared alongside family members of Virginia Giuffre, a prominent Epstein accuser who died by suicide in April, and criticized what they called a long-standing failure to deliver justice.

Jess Michaels, who alleges Epstein raped her in 1991, described him as a “master manipulator” and said his behavior followed a calculated strategy that left young women and teenage girls defenseless. Michaels cited a “severe miscarriage of justice” and delays in accountability as her motivation for speaking out. Her remarks echoed the sentiments of other survivors who say they were also groomed and abused.

Wendy Avis and Jena-Lisa Jones, both of whom say they were 14 when Epstein abused them, condemned the silence of adults who may have witnessed the abuse. Jones stated that many people around Epstein “very clearly knew what was going on” but have refused to speak up. Avis, speaking publicly for the first time, stressed that victims like her still haven’t received justice, calling for broader recognition of the everyday people affected.

All six women, including Marijke Chartouni, Lisa Phillips, and Liz Stein, expressed deep frustration with the Justice Department. Stein accused officials of failing to protect or inform survivors and backed bipartisan efforts in Congress to force transparency. Their statements came just before the Republican-led House Oversight Committee released over 33,000 pages of Epstein-related documents.

Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie are leading a legislative push to investigate alleged mishandling of the federal probes into Epstein and Maxwell. Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year prison sentence, continues to deny wrongdoing. Phillips warned that if the system continues to fail them, survivors are prepared to take justice into their own hands: “We’ll compile our own list.”

In a significant move to advance the nation’s clean energy goals, the U.S. Senate has overwhelmingly approved legislation designed to revitalize and modernize the country’s nuclear energy sector. The bill passed with strong bipartisan support in an 88-2 vote and now heads to the president’s desk for final approval.

The newly passed legislation combines nuclear energy reforms with the reauthorization of programs that support the U.S. Fire Administration and local fire departments. This package is expected to streamline the process of launching new nuclear projects while supporting critical emergency services across the country.

One of the bill’s primary objectives is to accelerate the approval timeline for constructing new nuclear power plants, especially as many older reactors near retirement. The measure reduces licensing fees for power companies and instructs the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to identify ways to make environmental review processes more efficient.

“This legislation helps expand our options to meet growing energy demands while addressing climate challenges,” said White House National Climate Advisor Ali Zaidi.

Senator Shelley Moore Capito noted the bill’s forward-looking focus, particularly in supporting the development of small modular reactors (SMRs), a newer, more flexible form of nuclear technology. “This is about the future of nuclear,” Capito told reporters. “We need to be ready.”

Experts in the energy sector believe the legislation will help simplify regulatory pathways, making it easier for the industry to develop clean, reliable power solutions. Lesley Jantarasami, managing director of the Bipartisan Policy Center’s energy program, stated, “It’s a facilitator of the process by which industry gets approvals to build projects. That efficiency matters.”

Nuclear energy currently provides about 20% of the electricity generated in the United States. Supporters of the bill highlight the importance of this power source, noting that nuclear plants produce electricity without emitting carbon or air pollutants. With energy demand on the rise and environmental concerns growing, many believe nuclear energy can play a vital role in a diverse and resilient power grid.

However, the measure has also sparked discussion among safety advocates. Some experts caution that changing the NRC’s mission to avoid “unnecessary” regulation may raise questions about safety oversight. Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, warned that certain provisions could limit the NRC’s ability to strengthen safety standards. “The intention may be efficiency, but it’s important to ensure safety remains a top priority,” he said.

Despite concerns, the bill has received widespread support in both chambers of Congress. In the House of Representatives, it passed by a vote of 393-13, with only a few lawmakers expressing reservations.

As of August 2023, the United States had 93 nuclear reactors operating at 54 facilities across 28 states. These plants have consistently supplied around one-fifth of the country’s electricity for over three decades. Globally, the U.S. remains the leading producer of nuclear power, with France ranking second in capacity and boasting the highest percentage of electricity generated by nuclear—approximately 68%.

Looking ahead, the newly passed legislation may serve as a catalyst for a new era of nuclear innovation in the U.S., helping meet growing power needs while supporting low-emission energy solutions.

The Department of Justice on Monday backed the state of Texas in its redistricting dispute, arguing that the new congressional map approved by the Republican-controlled Legislature does not constitute an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The ruling, for now, clears the way for the Lone Star State to implement its newly redrawn maps ahead of the 2026 midterms.

In an amicus brief, Solicitor General John Sauer, representing the Trump administration, said the lower court erred in blocking the map from taking effect. He urged the Supreme Court to intervene and overturn the ruling. Sauer wrote in his filing: “This is not a close case.”

Sauer argued that the lower court misinterpreted the rationale behind the Legislature’s decision to adjust five congressional districts in a way that favored Republicans. He said the changes were driven by political considerations, not race, and therefore did not violate federal voting laws or the Constitution.

“There is overwhelming evidence — both direct and circumstantial — of partisan objectives, and any inference that the State inexplicably chose to use racial means is implausible,” Sauer wrote.

Sauer also defended a letter sent earlier this year by Civil Rights Division chief Harmeet Dhillon, in which the Justice Department urged Texas to address “coalition districts” that tend to favor Democrats. Opponents of the map have cited the letter as evidence of racial motivations behind the redistricting process.

Shortly after the letter was issued, Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, added redistricting to the Legislature’s agenda, prompting a dramatic walkout in which state Democrats temporarily left the state in protest.

The lower court “misinterpreted the letter’s meaning; and more importantly, the court misunderstood the letter’s significance to the legislature’s adoption of the 2025 map,” Sauer argued.

The plaintiffs involved in the case, consisting of various voting and immigrant rights organizations, contended that Dhillon’s letter called for the disbanding of the coalition districts and the concentration of Black and Latino voters into different districts.

“The DOJ letter, riddled with legal and factual errors, incorrectly asserted that these districts were ‘unconstitutional coalition districts’ that Texas was required to ‘rectify’ by changing their racial makeup,” the plaintiffs argued in their legal filing.

Texas’ mid-cycle redistricting battle is one of several conflicts emerging nationwide as President Donald Trump faces the possibility of a less favorable Republican House map in 2026. In California, voters approved a last-minute ballot measure that would offset the five Republican gains made in Texas. Utah adopted a new map that benefits Democrats, while Virginia has begun steps toward another redrawing process that would also benefit Democrats.

Louisiana’s map, which favors the GOP, is currently awaiting review by the Supreme Court. Missouri also underwent redistricting, adding a GOP-favored seat, and Indiana’s legislature is considering the same thing next month, which would benefit Republicans.

The Department of Justice recently filed suit against California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, contending that the state’s new redistricting plan was unconstitutionally driven by race — a position that contrasts with its stance in the Texas case.

Texas has asked the Supreme Court to stay last week’s 2–1 ruling by a three-judge panel in the Western District of Texas, which found that race played an impermissibly significant role in the Legislature’s mid-cycle redraw.

“This summer, the Texas Legislature did what legislatures do: politics,” Texas’ attorneys argued in their request.

In a sharply worded dissent, U.S. District Judge Jerry Brown, a Reagan appointee, criticized the three-judge panel’s ruling, calling it the “most blatant exercise of judicial activism” he had encountered during his career. He described the majority’s opinion as a “work of fiction.”

Justice Samuel Alito issued an administrative stay of the panel’s ruling, and the full Supreme Court could issue a more definitive decision on the map at any time.

Texas attorneys have also urged the Court to block the lower court’s order on the grounds that it disrupts the 2026 midterm election cycle, noting that candidates have already begun filing to run under the newly enacted map.

I thought it would be a sweet, quiet tribute.
It turned into a public reckoning.
One slow song, one spotlight, and my mother’s entire life story was dragged into the center of the gym—along with every lie my stepsister told herself about who the “embarrassing” one really was. By the end of the night, my family

I walked into prom thinking I was just giving my mom a memory she’d been robbed of at seventeen. Instead, I watched the woman who’d sacrificed everything for me finally be seen, not as a mistake or a cautionary tale, but as the quiet hero she’d always been. The moment the principal told our story and the crowd began chanting my mom’s name, something shifted permanently in our house. My mom’s shame cracked; in its place stood a woman who realized she had nothing to apologize for.

Brianna’s cruelty didn’t disappear with one grounding or one apology letter, but the power balance changed. My stepdad drew a hard line, my mom finally saw who would stand up for her, and I understood that loving someone sometimes means putting them under a spotlight they were taught they didn’t deserve. That night didn’t fix everything. It did something better: it told the truth, out loud, and made it impossible to go back.

Fans are distracted by background details when Karoline Leavitt posts adorable photos of herself with her husband and infant son.

Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary, shares new pictures of her husband and baby boy at work after a surprise visit.

Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary for the White House, just gave her fans a unique look into her personal life.

The youngest press secretary in history, Karoline Leavitt, posted sweet pictures of her family visiting her at work, but the main attraction was a small background detail.

Leavitt shared adorable photos from her husband Nicholas Riccio’s and their eight-month-old son Niko’s visit to the White House on Instagram on Tuesday.

Even in 2025, many of the world’s longest-living entertainers continue to inspire millions with their dedication, creativity, and lifelong contributions to the arts. These remarkable individuals helped shape film, television, and music across multiple eras, leaving behind legacies that remain deeply meaningful. Their continued presence reminds audiences that passion, talent, and imagination do not fade with age. Instead, their stories show how creative expression can evolve and flourish throughout an entire lifetime, offering encouragement to new generations of artists and admirers.

Elizabeth Waldo, born in 1918, remains a celebrated figure for her influential work in preserving and promoting indigenous music. Her dedication to cultural research and musical exploration continues to resonate with scholars, educators, and performers who study traditional sounds from around the world. Similarly, Karen Marsh Doll stands as one of Hollywood’s oldest surviving actresses, providing a rare and cherished connection to cinema’s golden age. Her links to beloved classics such as The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind make her an invaluable resource for film historians and a nostalgic presence for longtime movie fans. Ray Anthony, now 103, also continues to draw admiration as one of the last living big-band leaders. His music keeps the dynamic spirit of American swing alive, offering a vibrant reminder of a distinctive and influential era in entertainment history.

Other iconic stars such as June Lockhart, Eva Marie Saint, and Dick Van Dyke remain beloved for their decades of uplifting performances. Their lasting appeal comes from both their talent and their warm presence, which have brought joy to audiences for generations. Comedy legends Mel Brooks and William Shatner, along with the timeless Barbara Eden, continue to share their creativity through new projects, appearances, and public engagements. Their enthusiasm and humor show that imagination can remain strong at any stage of life, proving that artistic expression is not limited by age. These performers have become symbols of positivity and perseverance, inspiring fans who appreciate how their careers have evolved over time.

Meanwhile, stars like Clint Eastwood, Sophia Loren, and Michael Caine demonstrate extraordinary resilience and dedication to their craft. Even in their 90s, they continue to contribute meaningful work, showcasing the depth of their experience and artistic insight. Julie Andrews, Shirley MacLaine, Al Pacino, and Jane Fonda also embody a powerful blend of accomplishment and cultural influence. Through their performances, activism, writing, and continued engagement with the public, these figures highlight the lasting impact of creativity driven by passion and purpose. Together, these remarkable individuals remind the world that true artistry does not diminish with age—it endures, adapts, and continues to inspire long after the spotlight fades.

President Donald Trump just dropped a tax policy bombshell that has millions of American seniors celebrating.

In a new announcement shared directly on social media, Trump confirmed that starting next year, seniors aged 65 and older will be eligible for a brand-new $6,000 tax deduction.

Even better: Married couples where both spouses are over 65 will now qualify for a total deduction of $12,000 under this change.

This move is part of Trump’s 2026 tax proposal aimed at helping retirees keep more of what they earn and secure their financial future.

For many seniors living on fixed incomes or Social Security, this is a massive relief — especially with inflation and rising costs eating into retirement savings.

Critics are already questioning the long-term impact, but Trump’s base is calling it a win for the “forgotten generation.”

Trump’s message was clear: “America’s seniors built this country — it’s time we give back to them.”

If you’re 65 or older, this could mean thousands saved next year alone.

We’ll be watching for updates as this plan moves through Congress, but for now — check if you qualify and be ready when tax season comes.

He did it again… and seniors are the big winners.